Truancy
Truancy programs focus on youth with unauthorized absences in order to prevent system involvement. Programs can become involved with youth at different stages of absenteeism, with schools referring youth who have 5-10 unexcused absences up to the county attorney’s officer referring youth to the program when their level of absences requires legal intervention. Truancy programs can also be part of diversion.
Types of Truancy Programs:
Monitor Only Programs – Program is monitoring attendance (but is not intervening) and the case is not under review by the County Attorney for filing.
Truancy Intervention – Program has begun to take steps to intervene with the juvenile or the family at the request of the school or parent.
Truancy Diversion – The county attorney has filed a truancy petition (or will file one if the youth does not complete the truancy intervention).
Evaluating Truancy Programs
As part of our yearly evaluations for Community-based Juvenile Services Aid funded programs in fiscal year 2024, the JJI developed evaluation matrices to categorize important processes and outcomes for each program type evaluated. The following categories describe the important program processes and outcome indicators for truancy programs. These categories can be used to assess the standing of a program in terms of whether it is successfully applying best practices and meeting expectations or common goals for a truancy program. For additional resources or to access articles referenced below, contact the JJI at unojji@unomaha.edu.
Meeting Data Standards
Any program assessment must start by reviewing what data is available on processes and outcomes. Incomplete data or small sample sizes (i.e. few client cases) increase the risk of error in analysis. Shreffler and Huecker (2023) describe what Type I and II errors are – with high risks for error we might fail to identify a positive impact that’s occurring or falsely state the program was effective when it wasn’t. Small sample sizes run the risk of an outlier (one or two cases with unique, or very low/high values in an outcome) skewing the results.
References: Shreffler, J. & Huecker, M.R. (2023, March 13). Type I and type II errors and statistical power. National Library of Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557530/.
Processes: Serving a Representative Population
Any community-based service and/or program should strive to serve eligible youth equitably across demographic groups. For truancy programs, the best comparison group to compare the program’s referrals and enrollment rates to is the local school or district’s chronic absentee population. For our fiscal year 2024 evaluations, we obtained this data upon request from the Nebraska Department of Education.
In a study of a small, rural secondary school with a majority Latinx population located in a historically white state, Grooms and Galvez Bohorquez (2022) found that the truancy intervention providers struggled to engage some populations of students, largely because “the ‘story’ about absenteeism…is heavily dependent on perceptions about Latinx students and their families and minimizes the impact of institutional factors, such as school climate and culture…[these views] suggest that students and families from minoritized backgrounds—in this case, race, class, and immigration status—are responsible for the problem of absenteeism because of their own deficiencies” (p. 396). This underscores the importance of culturally responsive programs and acknowledgment of biases that might cloud a providers approach to absenteeism-intervention.
Malika and colleagues (2021) identified risk and protective factors for chronic absenteeism specific for low-income and minority children and adolescents: asthma, being overweight, family risk factors (e.g., family drug use, lack of support) experiencing bullying, perceptions of poor school safety increased risk for chronic absenteeism while support at home, increased sleep, and a positive growth mindset protected against chronic absenteeism. When targeting these risk/protective factors, a program is more likely to be successful in promoting school attendance.
References: Grooms, A.A. & Galvez Bohorquez, D. (2022). What’s your excuse? Sensemaking about chronic absenteeism in a rural Latinx high school. Journal of School Leadership, 32(4), 384-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846211026260
Malika, N., Granillo, C., Irani, C., Montgomery, S., & Belliard, J.C. (2021). Chronic absenteeism: Risks and protective factors among low-income, minority children and adolescents. Journal of School Health, 91(12), 1046-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13096
Processes: Discharging Youths Successfully
No matter how well a program implements best practices and effective interventions in their processes, if the program is not consistently engaging youth and maintaining the clients through the entire program to a successful discharge, they are unlikely to experience substantial change or progress. In particular, it’s important to target intervention to moderate- and high-risk youths. In a previous study of Nebraska truancy programs, Hobbs and colleagues (2018) found youths with higher rates of absenteeism demonstrated significant attendance improvement after intervention, but youths with lower-level absenteeism did not significantly improve. However, early, low-level intervention can still be beneficial for youth, particularly when addressing resource needs like lack of transportation.
References: Hobbs, A., Kotlaja, M., & Wylie, L. (2018). Absenteeism interventions: An approach for common definitions in statewide program evaluations. Justice Evaluation Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2018.1517584
Outcomes: Attendance
For truancy programs, the obvious key goal is to improve student’s attendance at school. A good way to assess whether a truancy program is effectively reducing absenteeism is to collect data on the students’ absences and tardies prior to enrollment in the truancy program (e.g., absences for one semester or school year prior) and collect data on the students’ attendance while involved in the program or directly following completion. For our evaluations, the JJI evaluated statistical change in average absences pre-program involvement and during program involvement to assess whether programs made a significant impact overall with the youth they served.
The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP, 2010), in a review of research on best practices in truancy prevention, recommend programs involve the students’ parents/guardians, implement meaningful sanctions for truancy along with meaningful incentives for attendance, provide ongoing support for students, and involve community resources and partnerships.
References: Development Services Group, Inc., 2010. “Truancy prevention.” Literature review. Washington, D.C.: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/Truancy_Prevention.pdf
Outcomes: Other School-based outcomes
Consistent evidence has found successful truancy programs should also improve other school-based outcomes like student’s performance (i.e., grades) and attachment to school (OJJDP, 2010). A student’s school attachment can be measured as their engagement in class, relationships with teachers and school staff, appreciation for the value of education. A students performance may be measured through class grades, overall GPA, or homework completion. The most positive effects of truancy programs are seen when they target multiple domains in a youth’s life. Haight and colleagues (2014) suggest “individualized meetings may [be] instrumental in reducing youth problem behavior by increasing student attachment to school… mentoring and social support [can] have a direct effect on enhancing school attendance and related variables, such as satisfaction and grades” (pp. 784-785).
References: Development Services Group, Inc., 2010. “Truancy prevention.” Literature review. Washington, D.C.: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/Truancy_Prevention.pdf
Haight, C.M., Chapman, G.V., Hendron, M., Loftis, R., & Kearney, C. (2014). Evaluation of a truancy diversion program at nine at-risk middle schools. Psychology in the Schools, 51(7), 779-787. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21775
Outcomes: Reducing Future System Involvement
A major goal of the Community-based Juvenile Services Aid funding is to provide community-based services for juveniles who come in contact with the juvenile justice system and prevent youth from moving deeper into the system. All Community-based Aid (CBA) funded programs are evaluated on how effective they are at preventing future system involvement after youth are discharged from the program.
Truancy is itself a status offense for youth, and so many truancy programs are housed within county diversion programs in Nebraska. Targeting and reducing truancy can also be effective at preventing or reducing other, more serious system involvement. The OJJDP’s review of research on truancy prevention and intervention explain “truancy has been clearly identified as one of the early warning signs that youths are potentially headed for delinquency activity” (p. 1). Thus, intervening early when youth are starting to show signs of chronic absenteeism can potentially prevent continued involvement in the justice system later in adolescence or adulthood.
References: Development Services Group, Inc., 2010. “Truancy prevention.” Literature review. Washington, D.C.: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/Truancy_Prevention.pdf
Additional Resources
JCMS Guides
*You can find more JCMS training materials and videos on the Trainings & Tools page.
Resources for Truancy Prevention & Intervention
OJJDP publishes literature reviews on what works for juvenile delinquency prevention and intervention, including for truancy intervention. See also their recent webinar on “Talking Truancy and Other Status Offenses: Strategies for Prevention and Intervention.”
The OJJDP also hosts the Tribal Youth Resource Center which provides resources and guidance for providing community-based services to indigenous youth. Clough and colleagues (2022) produced a resource guide specifically for preventing truancy among tribal youth.
Research & Best Practices